My
interest in any movie about the Art World is complicated. The first question is
“has Velvet Buzzsaw ripped off my
unpublished novel, Work Shy where an
artist’s reputation is made after an early, suspicious death?” Secondly, does it
add to the canon of movies that really describe that alien world like maybe Basquiat or Pollock?” There is already a memoir from Australia with the same
title as my book. That shook me up. Luckily, it is the memoir of musician, Dave
Raney who’s a legend Down Under. He used to sing with the post-punk band, the Moodists.
Oddly enough, I met him once upon a time. Hopefully, his effort will not
infringe on my up and coming brand. I was worried about Velvet Buzzsaw since the story tells of an Outsider Artist made
famous and “wealthy” after death. My view is that the Art World is dangerous
enough without any added drama. “Outsider Art” is now big business and dealers
have their own Art Fairs to milk the tortured and deceased artists who were
frequently poor and mentally challenged. What a relief to see the film and
realize it is a different sort of fish – plotted around the meme of artist as
supernatural serial killer with a nod to A
Picture of Dorian Gray (1945) – so I don’t have to sue the Director,
Dan Gilroy. Speaking of Art Fairs, it could be that the release of Velvet Buzzsaw was timed to create extra
buzz for the opening of the first Frieze
LA this month. Lord knows, there are enough rich celebrities in Hollywood
who can afford to be high-level collectors if you can pry them off the red
carpet.
There
are not a lot of films that deal with the realities of the Art World much less its
connection to most artist schlubs and their day jobs. I
had researched this arena for inclusion in my own story starting with way-old
films like The Horse’s Mouth (1958) with
Alec Guinness as the near crazy English painter, Gully Jimson. Artists are
frequently depicted as insane (Van Gogh) or charlatans (Warhol). Add to that
the Faustian painting pact with the Devil, Oscar Wilde’s, Dorian Gray. High Art (1998) did a fine job with Ally Sheedy and
friends depicting ‘intellectuals’ leading up to the ‘adventurous’ Lesbian love
scene. Content like this is now ubiquitous and can be seen as family viewing every
night on HBO! The most recent send-up was Art
School Confidential (2006) that
had a great take on flakey, first year students. It was originally a “cartoon” graphic
novel by Daniel Clowes. Of course, Hollywood added steroids and the movie fell
short with a superfluous murder plot. It is not a coincidence that John
Malevich is in both films playing a similar disenchanted professor/artist. He
is the perfect over-the-hill narcissist. ASC
also featured the wonderful Steve Buscemi who I mention all the time in my
novel because it is the right thing to do.
Art
snobbery starts way down the food chain and only grows with the money. I
recognize the syndrome from my own time on the margins in NY, London and even
Philadelphia. Local curators are referred to as the “Art Mafia” by my fictional
and disenfranchised Work Shy characters.
Even in Philly art careers are made by the governance of certain players. I
won’t say the local art criticism has much to do with the rise and fall of
artists but one can see when the flavor of the month is being nurtured in the
press around Pew Grant time. The buzz has been severely diminished lately by
the disappearance of the old hard-copy weeklies and normally stops at the city
limits.
Although
VB falls short of any meaningful, in-depth
depiction, it is a lot of fun as it falls into a well-worn kill-all-the-snobs
horror movie; it could have been titled Das
Nicht Schadenfreud! But how little “scare”
there was as the Outsider Art comes alive. Normally I would be hiding being the
sofa when a scary painting rips VIPS into parts. Could it be that the creation
of these movies for the flat and smallish screen limits the scope? I really
didn’t feel vindicated when justice was dispensed or I didn’t hate the critic (Jake
Gyllenhaal) and curators enough. How can you hate Rene Russo? There was an
attempt to get behind the stage like in The
Player (1992) but it wasn’t wise enough for that. Even my un-edited manuscript
devises to include a cinematic version of itself! Pretty fucking clever. I only
hope Malevich or Buscemi will still be available. It is disappointing to think what
VB could have achieved. The title’s
mash up of Velvet Underground and Buzzcocks strikes me as a wholly
contrived bid for punkish street cred very far from today’s slick concern for
auction prices. I remember Basquiat (1998)
having some real 80’s SOHO feel only a painter/director like Julian Schnabel
could deliver. Fact and fiction merge literally with David Bowie’s Warhol. The
film I Shot Andy Warhol (1996) was
also informative. Not many know the story of Valerie Solanas. The seamy
underside still resonates. Warhol and Basquiat had some mysterious connection
that finished them off within a year or so of each other. Weird. I am glad that we have another movie about
the art world but wish that Velvet Buzzsaw
had a few more creepy notes of Polanski or David Lynch. It could have been a
cult classic rather than standard Netflix fare.
-->
-->
2 comments:
I didn't hate the characters either. The film was a little diffuse. Would have helped if it had been made clearer that the artist really wanted his stuff destroyed. That would have meant that the artist's intentions, sealed by death if you will, and inviolate, were egregiously transgressed by the critics and gallery people, who would have then truly deserved their comeuppance. As it was, I thought, gee, the world of evil spirits was a little rough on these guys.
Yeah. I get what you are saying, bro.
Post a Comment