When I first heard about the
imminent publishing of Harper Lee’s so-called second novel, I knew there was something
hinky going on. Clearly, it had not been set in motion by the author (89) who
lives in a nursing home. After trying to publish my own first novel, I have
experienced the industry's peculiarities. They are much akin to the art world
in which all gatekeepers want a track record (branding)
no matter what the quality of the work. This is why the same artists are shown
over and over locally and worldwide. This forces masses of creative individuals
to invent identities online. This is called nano-casting, so I’m told, replacing
previous narrowcasting – all derived from the original word, broadcasting, if
you follow the flow of media jargon. Here novices can tough it out in a
crowd of millions with a personal websites and a Twitter accounts. There is
always a chance of discovery in a sea of drek, incessant social media and
celebrity bullshit. Good luck, sucker.
I read the first chapter of Watchman last week in the Wall Street
Journal. Later, there was a follow up editorial about the discovery of the
manuscript in Harper’s safe-deposit box by her life-long attorney, Tonya B.
Carter in Alabama, 2011. There was a PBS documentary with a
story of a different slant, mostly to do with the civil rights aspects of
both book and film. The rest will come out in the wash as everyone discovers Go Set A Watchman was clearly the
trial go for ‘Mockingbird.’ It was written before our beloved American classic
novel featuring adorable tomboy, Scout and upstanding lawyer dad, Gregory Peck. He
ends up representing all progressive, liberal whites then and now. I mention Peck because I
have seen the film numerous times while never reading the actual book! My High School English class read Moby Dick instead and Mark Twain, two guy
writers. Sorry. My ignorance is appalling, but can you see the wool being
pulled over us sheep? Is it a trivial matter that Peck appeared in both films?
Well, maybe, but I digress.
Yet another recent PBS radio discussion
was on point and questioned the ethics of publishing Watchman. A guest author – die-hard literary guy who’d never seen
the film version – used the term, “sinister packaging.” I concur. They played
Reese Witherspoon reading a bit of the same chapter from the book-on-tape. Fine, but all this fuss is not just
about Mockingbird but the subsequent film that met many more eyes over many decades. That is the nature of popular culture. I have picked up a flyer
from my local bricks & mortar bookstore – there is still one in NW Philly –
advertising the sale and reading of Watchman
accompanied by a screening of Mockingbird.
I have to curb my enthusiasm. What about the connection between Truman Capote
(In Cold Blood, another book and film) and Nelle? Is there a darker side to
this story?
No comments:
Post a Comment